The Fundamentals

Author:

Aldrich John H.,Bae Suhyen,Sanders Bailey K.

Abstract

Abstract This chapter turns to how competing interests and concerns shape the strength of a democratic system. It begins with Madison’s consideration of what we call crosscutting versus reinforcing cleavages. The increased likelihood of many crosscutting cleavages was at the root of his argument for the new Constitution for America. Those who study democracies both here and in comparative democratic contexts have argued that the absence of crosscutting cleavages threatens the stability of democratic institutions, in ways Madison would fully understand. Might the increasing alignment of the originally diverse set of fundamentals mean that such a concern is nearing for the United States? This chapter measures and tests how close America is to having a singular, deep, and strongly reinforced cleavage from the partisan-sorted fundamentals. The change over the post-1984 era, especially the last few elections, is dramatic. Crosscutting cleavages have given way to a stronger and stronger reinforcing cleavage.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference126 articles.

1. Affective and Semantic Components in Political Person Perception.;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1982

2. Is Polarization a Myth?;Journal of Politics,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3