Sanctions on Iran

Author:

Tama Jordan

Abstract

Abstract“Sanctions on Iran” examines the political dynamics that have marked recent US debates over imposing or lifting sanctions on Iran. From the 1990s until 2013, Iran sanctions debates were routinely characterized by strong bipartisanship in Congress and tensions between Capitol Hill and the White House, as lawmakers in both parties repeatedly pressed for new sanctions that presidents considered ill-advised. This political constellation was fueled by concerns about Iran’s nuclear program that were widely shared by Americans across the ideological spectrum, as well as by support for sanctions by an influential advocacy group with close ties to both parties. However, policy debates on the issue became more polarized once the focus of Iran policy shifted to a major nuclear agreement negotiated by Barack Obama with Iran and other countries, which raised the partisan stakes of the issue and brought to the fore a core left-right ideological fault line over multilateralism.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference463 articles.

1. Conducting and Coding Elite Interviews.;PS: Political Science & Politics,2002

2. The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of US Elections in the 21st Century.;Electoral Studies,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3