Ecology, Complex Systems, and Sociology

Author:

Bliemel Martin,O’Connor Allan,Daniel Lisa,de Klerk Saskia,Scheepers Margarietha de Villiers,Miles Morgan

Abstract

Abstract This chapter aims to provide researchers and policymakers with a pragmatic understanding of three different approaches to entrepreneurial ecosystem (EE) research. In particular, we aim to inform theoretical framework selection for researchers and policymakers who share an interest in the cultivation, enrichment, and evolution of entrepreneurial ecosystems. To do so, we illuminate three perspectives of entrepreneurial ecosystems and provide guidance on the theoretical frameworks and methods in their research application. Each of the three frameworks encapsulates a particular ecosystem epistemology (biological ecologies, complex adaptive systems, and community capitals). These frameworks converge regarding their emphasis on diversity among ecosystem elements and their inter-relationships, and situatedness within multilevel contexts. A methodological commonality here is the use of qualitative grassroots approaches to assessing entrepreneurial ecosystems. To illustrate the similarities and differences in frameworks and their associated epistemologies and methods, we discuss how these vary in research application. Selecting a framework has implications for research methods and thus also what types of insights can be gained, such as on how EEs can be designed, shaped, or governed.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference98 articles.

1. Academy for Systems Change. 2019. ‘Leverage Points and the Iceberg Model in Economic Development’. https://www.academyforchange.org/2019/12/07/leverage-points-iceberg-model-economic-development/. Accessed 20 January 2022.

2. The Lineages of the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Approach;Small Business Economics,2017

3. Applying a Community Entrepreneurship Development Framework to Rural Regional Development;Small Enterprise Research,2018

4. Aeeni, Z., and M. Saeedikiya. 2019. ‘Complexity Theory in the Advancement of Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Research: Future Research Directions’. In Eurasian Business Perspectives, edited by M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, E. Demir, and U. Can, 19–37. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

5. Using an Ecological Perspective to Study Organizational Founding Rates;Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,1990

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3