Living Ethics and Methods as Questions

Author:

Krystalli Roxani

Abstract

Abstract This chapter discusses the ethical, methodological, and narrative dilemmas of researching the politics of victimhood. The discussion is deliberately organized around questions, as this is how research dilemmas are lived. These questions correspond to different phases of the research process, highlighting that ethical and methodological dilemmas pertain not only to the research design and fieldwork, but also to the processes of analysis and writing. Among the dilemmas are questions about where to direct the research gaze, where theory comes from, how to ground the inquiry in time and place, how to investigate victimhood without placing the narrative burden exclusively on people who suffered harm, and how to navigate the complicated expectations of loyalty among different interlocutors. The chapter illuminates that discussions of feminist research methods and ethics are inseparable from each other, from the findings of the research, and from the politics of victimhood.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference381 articles.

1. Victimhood Dissociation and Conflict Resolution: Evidence from the Colombian Peace Plebiscite;Theory and Society,2021

2. ‘Agreement on Victims of the Conflict: Comprehensive System of Truth, Justice, Reparation, and Non-Repetition’. Alto Comisionado para La Paz, 2016. https://www.peaceagreements.org/wgenerateAgreementPDF/1547.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3