In Defense of Birthright Citizenship

Author:

Sullivan Michael J.

Abstract

Abstract Chapter 3 argues that political communities should not be free to decide whether to deny citizenship, and its substantial protections, to infants based on their parents’ immigration status, actions, or allegiances. Territorial birthright citizenship offers the promise of integration on equal terms with other citizens. In the United States, equal protection of the law for the children of irregular immigrants means a free public education, on the grounds that “legislation directing the onus of a parent’s misconduct against his children” that “does not comport with fundamental conceptions of justice” (Plyler v. Doe 1982, 220). Immigrants who entered a country without authorization as children should not be held culpable for their parents’ immigration violations. Children of irregular immigrants deserve separate consideration for immigration benefits and citizenship apart from citizens’ judgment of their parents’ conduct as irregular entrants or visa overstayers.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference902 articles.

1. Migrant Justice as Reproductive Justice: Birthright Citizenship and the Politics of Immigration Detention for Pregnant Women in Canada.;Citizenship Studies,2021

2. The COVID-19 Pandemic: Effects on Civil Registration of Births and Deaths and on Availability and Utility of Vital Events Data.;American Journal of Public Health,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3