Abstract
Abstract
This chapter develops the first of the patient-centered criteria laid down in Chapter 2: prioritize patient involvement. The aim is to lay down the foundations of an epistemic theory for patient-centered measures. Most of the development of this criterion focuses on the ethical and epistemic importance of prioritizing involvement of people with disabilities, patients, and other ill persons in the development of patient-centered measures. An approach to prioritizing patient involvement is developed called epistemic dialogue. Epistemic dialogue helps to foreground and take seriously marginalized testimony from the first-person perspective, but it also provides a role for secondhand perspectives such as health researchers. Thus, prioritizing patient involvement in measure development does not mean acquiescing to patient points of view; rather, it means coming to understand better the constructs patient-centered measures aim to access while making the most of the expertise people with disabilities, patients, and other ill people have on them.
Reference299 articles.
1. Appraising Convergent Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Systematic Reviews: Constructing Hypotheses and Interpreting Outcomes.;BMC Research Notes,2016
2. Incorporating the Patient’s Perspective into Drug Development and Communication: An Ad Hoc Task Force Report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonizations Group Meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001.;Value in Health,2003
3. Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2007. “Epistemologies of Ignorance: Three Types.” In Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance, edited by Shannon Sullivan and Nancy Tuana, 39–58. New York: SUNY Press.