Author:
Mhlana Siviwe,Moussié Rachel,Roever Sally,Rogan Michael
Abstract
Abstract
Throughout 2021, fiscal stimulus packages were introduced to jump-start the ‘post-pandemic’ economic recovery process. While calls for economic recovery packages that promise to ‘build back better’ have come from many directions, the under-allocation of recovery resources directed at workers in the informal economy threatens the recovery of livelihoods for the majority of the world’s workforce. This chapter analyses the economic recovery approaches of Bangladesh, Kenya, South Africa, and Thailand. The chapter assesses the economic recovery responses in light of what is known about the impact of the crisis on informal workers globally. The chapter assesses national recovery packages with particular attention to the largest segments of informal employment and those where women are over-represented. It concludes that more needs to be done to ensure that national-level economic recovery packages can support the livelihoods of the majority of workers in emerging and developing countries.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference47 articles.
1. Agarwala, R. (2009). ‘An Economic Sociology of Informal Work: The Case of India’. In N. Bandelj (ed.), Economic Sociology of Work (Research in the Sociology of Work), Vol. 18. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0277-2833(2009)0000018015.
2. Bangladesh Planning Commission (General Economics Division) (2020). ‘Making Vision 2041 a Reality: Perspective Plan of Bangladesh 2021–2041’ (March), available at: http://oldweb.lged.gov.bd/uploadeddocument/unitpublication/1/1049/vision%202021-2041.pdf (accessed October 2022).