Kant’s Political Liberalism

Author:

Church Jeffrey

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter argues that the author’s form of Kantian liberalism can be reasonably expected to command a wider overlapping consensus than Rawls’ liberalism. It can include more disagreement, the chapter argues, because of its thin account of liberalism’s end, namely, the single principle of independence. As Thomas Pogge has argued, the simplicity of Kant’s political theory—in its appeal to the single principle of external freedom—allows it to be affirmed from a Hobbesian or Millean view, or indeed from many religious views. At the same time, Kant’s distinction between legality and morality means that citizens need not abide by the law for moral reasons. They can obey for any reason, so long as they obey.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference283 articles.

1. What Properly Belongs to Me: Kant on Giving to Beggars,;Journal of Moral Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 6.,2014

2. Allison, Henry. 2009. “Teleology and History in Kant: The Critical Foundations of Kant’s Philosophy of History,” in Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim, ed. Amelie Oksenberg Rorty and James Schmidt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 24–45.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3