“Your DrugBuddy”

Author:

Lorenzo-Dus Nuria

Abstract

AbstractThe chapter’s analysis shows that Silk Road vendors went to considerable lengths to show keen interest in customers, typically presented as seeking to protect the Silk Road community from being tracked by law enforcement, scammed by other vendors, and subjected to drug-related harm. As part of their self-styling as experts, Silk Road users regularly shared externally (i.e., scientific) and internally (i.e., personal experience) sourced knowledge about drug use and dealing. By constructing a stance of openness, Silk Road users displayed business acumen (especially in the vendor profile pages). Styling of the target relied on stances of drug savviness and pleasantness that, respectively, catered to projected identities of Silk Road customers and fellow community members. Targets of digital commercial grooming were related to via deference (as customers) and interpersonal closeness (as fellow community members). As an illicit digital market, Silk Road was itself the target of efforts to detect and exploit its activity. Law enforcement and fraudulent vendors were constructed as its opponents. Law enforcement represented the state and, as such, constituted a direct challenge to Silk Road’s libertarian ethos. Styling of this enemy was primarily undertaken in the site’s forums, often instigated by the market’s administrator, and generally made use of moderate face-threat. In contrast, fraudulent vendors were othered through impoliteness oriented toward face (insults) and equity (belittling) rights. The strength of expression against these internal opponents was legitimated on community-based grounds, mainly lack of integrity as vendors (e.g., scams) and not being respectful to other market users.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference542 articles.

1. #familygoals: Family Influencers, Calibrated Amateurism, and Justifying Young Digital Labor.;Social Media & Society,2017

2. Why Terrorism Does Not Work.;International Security,2006

3. Addawood, Aseel, Adam Badawy, Kristina Lerman, and Emilio Ferrara. 2019. “Linguistic Cues to Deception: Identifying Political Trolls on Social Media.” Proceedings of the Thirteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2019). https://www.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/3205/3073.

4. Afilipoaie, Alois, and Patrick Shortis. 2015. “From Dealer to Doorstep: How Drugs Are Sold on the Dark Net.” Global Drug Policy Observatory Situation Analysis. https://www.swansea.ac.uk/media/From-Dealer-to-Doorstep-%C3%A2% C2%80%C2%93-How-Drugs-Are-Sold-On-the-Dark-Net.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3