A critical view on implementation

Author:

Ndulu Benno,Stuart Elizabeth,Dercon Stefan,Knaack Peter

Abstract

Abstract This chapter critically assesses implementation. Although it is too early to say what worked and causal pathways are undoubtedly too unclear to claim anything with certainty, this chapter offers an attempt to link back any failures—and apparent initial successes—to the three perspectives on the political economy of reform. Some are due to not getting bureaucratic politics right, such as turf wars and inter-ministerial siloes. Others are due to a lack of special interest groups. Still others have failed—at least so far—to take off because there never was an elite bargain in place that was willing to gamble on digital transformation in the first place. Similarly apparent success can also be associated with these three perspectives. The chapter states that the Kit has in some countries fostered a loose alliance of people with a shared interest in seeing the strategy primers converted into policy implementation, which helped achieve their goals.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference235 articles.

1. Aaronson, Susan Ariel. ‘Data is Different: Why the World Needs a New Approach to Governing Cross-Border Data Flows—Centre for International Governance Innovation’. Centre for International Governance Innovation, 14 November 2018. https://www.cigionline.org/publications/data-different-why-world-needs-new-approach-governing-cross-border-data-flows.

2. Access to Information Programme, Prime Minister’s Office. ‘Digital Bangladesh Concept Note’, 5 November 2009. http://btri.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/btri.portal.gov.bd/page/a556434c_e9c9_4269_9f4e_df75d712604d/Digital%20Bangladesh%20Concept%20Note_Final.pdf.

3. Access to Information Programme, Prime Minister’s Office. ‘Strategic Priorities of Digital Bangladesh’, January 2011. https://a2i.gov.bd/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/4-Strategy_Digital_Bangladesh_2011.pdf.

4. De Facto Political Power and Institutional Persistence;American Economic Review,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3