Can We Interpret Gardens?

Author:

Fenner David,Fenner Ethan

Abstract

Abstract Chapter 7—“Can We Interpret Gardens?”—examines arguments for gardens being interpretable, or being bearers of meaning, and arguments that claim that gardens cannot or do not possess meaning. Some of the arguments against interpreting gardens do not focus on the impossibility of gardens bearing meaning, or garden enthusiasts finding meaning in gardens, but rather that gardens are simply not particularly good about bearing or conveying meaning and that there are more profitable ways to appreciate gardens. More has been written on this topic in garden philosophy than perhaps any other, and so a full chapter is devoted to exploring the topic. Our view is that if a garden can be a work of art, and works of art are typically interpretable, then a garden that is a work of art should be interpretable, as well.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference213 articles.

1. Addison, Joseph, “On the Pleasures of the Imagination,” Nos. 411–421, in Robert Allen (ed.), Selections from The Tatler and The Spectator (New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1957).

2. Locke and Botany,”;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3