Urban Geography

Author:

Aitken Stuart,Mitchell Don

Abstract

The study of urbanization processes and urban spaces is contentious and problematic. Different disciplines focus on different processes and ways of knowing, and urban life—its contexts and problems—is tugged and twisted in so many directions that it is difficult to know the appropriate questions to ask, let alone to articulate future research directions. Mayors and other city leaders are concerned about civic boosterism and the quality of life in their cities, planners try to manage competing claims on space and movement, and environmentalists grapple with degradation and equity, while economists conjure up more appropriate models of development and growth. The urban arena is a context for competing intellectual claims and traditions that at times converge on consensus but more often than not garner dissent. We forefront our appraisal of the subfield with a contention that guides most of what is to follow. The contention is important because it necessarily limits the kinds of research we talk about. We argue that with the emergence of a more sophisticated articulation of spatial theory in the last decade, geographers are now well positioned to say something important about the urban issues that are shaping the new millennium. This sea change occurred in the 1990s and now places many aspects of geographic research at the forefront of urban analysis. The articulation of spatial theory comes in large part from two sources: first, critical geography with its focus on the spatial construction of social life and, second, from emerging ideas about technology and space. It is not our intention to dismiss the importance of empirical and interpretative studies, which are discussed tangentially in relation to the central theoretical themes of the chapter. In this review, however, we emphasize the articulation of spatial theory as a significant development in urban geography as we enter the twenty-first century. We begin in the first main section by picking up where “The Urban Problematic” left off in Geography in America (1989). We describe the ways in which American geography is rising to the challenge of understanding the tremendous changes that are underway in cities and argue that the work of urban geographers focusing on the roles of space and scale is critical to understanding these changes.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3