Conclusions

Author:

Pearson Elizabeth

Abstract

Abstract The final chapter of Extreme Britain discusses the key findings, and differences between the radical right and Islamist movements explored in the book. Through interviews, the book has argued that radicalization is in essence a masculinity project, which is to say that becoming extreme entails the fulfilment of particular and diverse masculinities, with one masculine performance able to legitimize another. It also explored misogyny in both movements, finding this directed against in-group, as well as out-group women. Nonetheless, the expressions of misogyny differed between groups, as did women’s opportunities for public leadership. The conclusions also explore how a new extremism definition might incorporate gender, recognizing its importance in identifying in- and out-group members. This finding is important for policymakers, and the chapter goes on to emphasize the need for caution in treating misogyny or toxic masculinity as causal factors in radicalization, or predictors of extremism. Finally, the chapter addresses the importance of gendered approaches in producing a rich and nuanced understanding of the power relations in extreme movements, and the lives of the people in them.

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Reference584 articles.

1. 5Pillars. “Tommy Robinson Publishes Book on the Holy Quran”. 5Pillars (blog). 2017. http://5pillarsuk.com/2017/07/22/tommy-robinson-publishes-book-on-the-holy-quran/. Last accessed 13 August 2023.

2. After 9/11: British South Asian Muslims, Islamophobia, Multiculturalism, and the State;American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences,2004

3. Muslim Minorities in Britain: Integration, Multiculturalism and Radicalism in the Post-7/7 Period;Journal of Intercultural Studies,2007

4. Ethnicity and Politics in Contextualising Far Right and Islamist Extremism;Perspectives on Terrorism,2017

5. Abbott, Diane. “Britain’s Crisis of Masculinity”. 16 May 2013. https://www.dianeabbott.org.uk/news/articles/item915. Last accessed 31 July 2023.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3