Author:
Bächtiger André,Gerber Marlène,Fournier-Tombs Eléonore
Abstract
Abstract
This chapter surveys the development of the Discourse Quality Index (DQI) from its original to its expanded versions. It documents the DQI’s various blind spots, ranging from the omission of substantive argumentative quality and sincerity to insufficient context- and goal-sensitivity. Special attention is given to aggregation strategies of the various DQI indicators and related validity issues especially in the context of the systemic approach. The chapter proposes new ways to capture context-sensitive and distributed forms of deliberation as well as provides a concrete illustration of how to aggregate deliberative quality in novel ways (e.g. via a Lexical Scale). Finally, it considers recent developments in the automated measurement of deliberative quality.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference47 articles.
1. Small Differences that Matter: The Impact of Discussion Modalities on Deliberative Outcomes’.;British Journal of Political Science,2016
2. Bächtiger, André. 2018. ‘A Preface to Studying Deliberation Empirically’. In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by André Bächtiger, John Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 657–662.
3. When Deliberative Theory Meets Empirical Political Science: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Political Deliberation’.;Political Studies,2010
4. Bächtiger, André, John Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren. 2018. ‘Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction’. In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by André Bächtiger, John Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren, pp. 1–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献