Abstract
AbstractThis chapter presents a novel interpretation of Kant’s account of appearances, according to which an appearance plays a role in an intuition akin to the role played by an object-dependent “sense” (Sinn), as this is understood on broadly Fregean accounts of cognitive content. It is argued that this approach best captures several key features that Kant attributes to appearances. Perhaps most importantly, this Fregean interpretation best captures the fact that, for Kant, appearances are representations of some further object (a “something = x”), despite being themselves the (phenomenologically) immediate objects of intuitions. The Fregean interpretation can help illuminate the ideality of appearances and the extent to which appearances might nevertheless count as dependent upon real things. This interpretation is contrasted with other recently prominent interpretations, such as those given by Aquila, Van Cleve, Langton, Allison, and Allais.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference58 articles.
1. Kant’s one world.;British Journal for the History of Philosophy,2004
2. Kant’s idealism and the secondary quality analogy.;Journal of the History of Philosophy,2007
3. Kant’s argument for transcendental idealism in the Transcendental Aesthetic.;Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,2010
4. Allais, L. (2011a). Transcendental idealism and the Transcendental Deduction. In D. Schulting & J. Verburght (Eds.), Kant’s idealism: New interpretations of a controversial doctrine (pp. 91–107). Springer.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献