Policy justifications under technocratic and populist cabinets

Author:

Karremans Johannes

Abstract

Abstract Imbalances between responsiveness and responsibility risk turning representative democracies into either populist or technocratic forms of rule. This intuition has so far only been explored at the theoretical level. Based on the variation in types of government experienced in Italy between 2008 and 2019, this chapter explores the intuition empirically. The analysis confirms the expectations only partially. Qualitative evidence shows that also technocratic governments need to be to some extent responsive to domestic demands, and that through institutionalized checks and balances also populist governments are forced to be responsible to some extent. Overall, despite its unique variation in type of government, the Italian case features the same trend over time in the balance between responsiveness and responsibility as that of other eurozone countries.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference193 articles.

1. Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies.;American Journal of Political Science,2004

2. The Costs of Responsibility for the Political Establishment of the Eurozone (1999–2015).;Party Politics,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3