Strategies for Internationalizing Justice

Author:

Grosescu Raluca

Abstract

Abstract This chapter examines the transnational mobilizations of Latin American and Central Eastern European justice activists to render justice for gross human rights violations perpetrated by the military and communist dictatorships during the Cold War. It demonstrates how Latin American actors deployed a variety of anti-impunity tactics, targeted numerous foreign jurisdictions, and legitimized their cause through a liberal humanitarian discourse on human rights. Through both their efforts in various Western European courts and the alliances they forged with Western lawyers and judicial officials, Latin American activists boosted universal jurisdiction as a principle of international criminal law. This principle was further enforced by Argentinian courts, which opened investigations into a variety of major international crimes committed across the globe. In contrast, Central Eastern European activists focused their mobilizations on the European level, lobbying for the establishment of a ‘Nuremberg for communist crimes’—an international legal instrument that would have put communist crimes on par with those of the Nazis. Their political discourses were often connected to radical conservative politics and aimed to delegitimize any leftist political thought. While managing to enforce a totalitarian interpretation of communism in European assemblies and to reshape the EU’s remembrance policy, Central Eastern European activists’ impact on the international justice system ultimately remained marginal.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference273 articles.

1. Estatalidad y calidad de la democracia en Paraguay’,;América Latina Hoy,2012

2. Abrão, Paulo and Marcelo D. Torelly. ‘Resistance to Change. Brazil’s Persistent Amnesty and Its Alternatives for Truth and Justice’, in Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability: Comparative and International Perspectives, edited by Francesca Lessa and Leigh Payne (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012): pp. 152–181.

3. Acuña, Carlos H. and Catalina Smulovitz. ‘Guarding the Guardians in Argentina: Some Lessons about the Risks and Benefits of Empowering the Courts’, in  Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies, edited by James McAdams (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997): pp. 93–122.

4. Albon, Mary. ‘ “Justice in Times of Transition”: Report of the Project’s Inaugural Meeting’, in Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, edited by Neil J. Kritz (Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press, 1995): pp. 42–54.

5. Alexy, Robert. ‘A Defence of Radbruch’s Formula’, in Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of Legal Order, edited by David Dyzenhaus (Oxford: Hart, 1999): pp. 15–39.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3