Abstract
Abstract
Society is organized by terms of association by which all are bound. The problem is to determine who has the right to define these terms of association. Democrats state that only the people have a right to rule over the society. And they argue that citizens ought to be equals in important respects in making these decisions. What is the basis of these views? We have seen that liberty accounts of democracy fail to provide a thorough understanding of the foundations of democratic decision making. In large part this failure is due to the dependence of these conceptions on consensus within the society. They are unable to account for the basic democratic principle that when there are dis agreements over what the terms of association are to be, that view that secures support from a majority of the citizens ought to be chosen. This is the problem of incompatibility. These theories also fail to account for the interests persons have in democratic decision making that explain why a person ought to be allotted equal shares in political rule. This is the problem of trade-offs.
Publisher
Oxford University PressNew York, NY
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. How to Not Go All-In on Public Justification;Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy;2023-11-17
2. The Suspension Problem for Epistemic Democracy;The Philosophical Quarterly;2023-09-21