DefendingPartly Intrinsic Taxon Essentialism

Author:

Devitt Michael

Abstract

AbstractChapter 1 went against the consensus in the philosophy of biology by arguing that Linnaean taxa, including species, have essences that are partly intrinsic underlying, probably largely genetic, properties: biological generalizations about the phenotypic properties of taxa require explanations that must advert to these essences. The present chapter responds to criticisms of that argument. My responses emphasize three distinctions: between structural and historical explanations, which is central to my argument for intrinsic essentialism; between the category and the taxon problems, which is central to my rejection of the main argument against intrinsic essentialism; between the conspecificity and taxon problems, which is central to my diagnosis of where the consensus has gone wrong. I deny that my essentialism is at odds with certain biological variations and that its talk of intrinsic essences is an uncalled for metaphysical addition to biology.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference264 articles.

1. A New Perspective on the Race Debate;The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,1998

2. The Meaning of ‘Race’: Folk Conceptions and the New Biology of Race;The Journal of Philosophy,2005

3. Ernst Mayr’s ‘Ultimate/Proximate’ Distinction Reconsidered and Reconstructed;Biology and Philosophy,2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3