Author:
Faulkner Sandra L.,Atkinson Joshua D.
Abstract
Abstract
In this chapter the authors discuss the importance of evaluating qualitative research, as well as different ideas about what counts as quality research. They explain different kinds of criteria for evaluating qualitative research, such as usefulness and saturation, and discuss criteria for evaluating arts-based research. The authors define the terms “rigor” and “vigor” as applied to qualitative research and discuss the disagreements that exist over the use of these terms. They present four frameworks that can be used to assess research ethics in a project. After reading this chapter, the authors hope that readers will be able to articulate what qualitative criteria are most important to them.
Publisher
Oxford University PressNew York
Reference352 articles.
1. Abbey-Lambertz, K. (2017, June 5). Official resigns after blaming Flint water crisis on “n****rs who don’t pay their bills.” Huffington Post. Accessed November 17, 2018, from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/flint-water-crisis-racism-unpaid-bills_us_59357729e4b0ca5db291d43b
2. Adams, T. E., & Boylorn, R. M. (2019). Public ethnography. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of methods for public scholarship (pp. 269–288). Oxford University Press.
3. Telling stories: Reflexivity, queer theory, and authoethnography.,2011
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献