Author:
Peng-Keller Simon,Winiger Fabian
Abstract
Abstract
This chapter explores how the discussions of the preceding chapters might contribute to a better understanding of the ‘spiritual dimension’ of health as a useful concept for global health research and practice. The frequency with which the WHO refers to this term may be an indication that it has a significant function in the health context. It is clear from the previous chapters that it has often served as an umbrella term. Such terms are comprehensive at the cost of specificity. ‘Medicine’, ‘care’, and ‘science’ are examples of this trade-off. Umbrella terms are starting points, not operational concepts. They fulfil an integrative function. Thus, the term ‘spiritual dimension’ bridges the divide between the religious and the secular spheres. This chapter examines the most comprehensive attempt to date by WHO internal actors to conceptually distinguish a ‘spiritual dimension’ of health from ‘mental’, ‘social’, and ‘physical’ dimensions, and discusses its potential as an evaluative concept relevant to healthcare professionals and researchers.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference34 articles.
1. Spiritual but Not Religious? Beyond Binary Choices in the Study of Religion;Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,2013
2. The Quebec Model of Recording Spiritual Care: Concepts and Guidelines;Charting Spiritual Care
3. Bender, Courtney, and Ann Taves. ‘Introduction: Things of Value’. In What Matters? Ethnographies of Value in a Not So Secular Age, edited by Courtney Bender and Ann Taves, 1–33. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.