Is the Bioethics of Space Missions Different from Bioethics on Earth?

Author:

Szocik Konrad

Abstract

AbstractSpace bioethics is different from bioethics related to biomedical problems considered on Earth. This chapter examines the areas and contexts that account for these differences. One of the differences is a different understanding of human enhancement, primarily in terms of its purpose and justification. The space mission environment is a new and different moral ecology from Earth’s. The space mission environment challenges some of the moral principles and rules, such as the principle of autonomy and the rule of informed consent, but at the same time places stronger demands on the application of other principles, such as the principle of beneficence, among others. Space bioethics resembles military ethics in many respects, but there are also important differences. The most important is that military ethics is focused on decisions concerning life and death. It seems that the differences between space bioethics and bioethics concerning earthly problems are quantitative rather than qualitative, and the main challenge remains the ability to appropriately weigh methods and balance principles and rules.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference386 articles.

1. Abney, K.  2017. Robots and space ethics. In P. Lin, K. Abney, and R. Jenkins (Eds.), Robot ethics 2.0: From autonomous cars to artificial intelligence (pp. 354–368). Oxford University Press.

2. Abney, K., and P. Lin. 2015. Enhancing astronauts: The ethical, legal and social implications. In J. Galliott (Ed.), Commercial space exploration: Ethics, policy and governance (pp. 245–257). Ashgate.

3. Abylkasymova, R. 2021. Book review. Human enhancements for space missions, lunar, martian, and future missions to the outer planets, Konrad Szocik (Ed.), Springer International Publishing (2020). Space Policy 57: 101443.

4. Ethical issues in a human mission to Mars.;Space Research Today,2019

5. Fundamental biological features of spaceflight: Advancing the field to enable deep-space exploration.;Cell,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3