Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism

Author:

Ganghof Steffen1

Affiliation:

1. Professor of Comparative Politics, University of Potsdam

Abstract

Abstract In a democracy, a constitutional separation of powers between the executive and the assembly may be desirable, but the constitutional concentration of executive power in a single human being is not. The book defends this thesis and explores ‘semi-parliamentary government’ as an alternative to presidential government. Semi-parliamentarism avoids power concentration in one person by shifting the separation of powers into the democratic assembly. The executive becomes fused with only one part of the assembly, even though the other part has at least equal democratic legitimacy and robust veto power on ordinary legislation. The book identifies the Australian Commonwealth and Japan, as well as the Australian states of New South Wales, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, and Western Australia, as semi-parliamentary systems. Using data from 23 countries and 6 Australian states, it maps how parliamentary and semi-parliamentary systems balance competing visions of democracy; it analyzes patterns of electoral and party systems, cabinet formation, legislative coalition-building, and constitutional reforms; it systematically compares the semi-parliamentary and presidential separation of powers; and it develops new and innovative semi-parliamentary designs, some of which do not require two separate chambers.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference417 articles.

1. A Structured Review of Semi-Presidential Studies: Debates, Results and Missing Pieces;British Journal of Political Science,2020

2. Representation, Bicameralism, Political Equality, and Sortition: Reconstituting the Second Chamber as a Randomly Selected Assembly;Perspectives on Politics,2020

3. Counter-Majoritarian Democracy: Persistent Minorities, Federalism, and the Power of Numbers;American Political Science Review,2021

4. The New Separation of Powers;Harvard Law Review,2000

5. Ajenjo, Natalia (2015), ‘Why Minority Governments in Spain? How the Party System Undermines Investiture Rules’, in Bjørn E. Rasch, Shane Martin, and José A. Cheibub (eds), Parliaments and Government Formation: Unpacking Investiture Rules (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 153–164.

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The personalization of government: concept and comparative analysis;Democratization;2024-08-21

2. TRANSFORMATIONS IN GOVERNANCE;Shared Rule in Federal Theory and Practice;2024-07-04

3. Conclusion;Shared Rule in Federal Theory and Practice;2024-07-04

4. National Consequences;Shared Rule in Federal Theory and Practice;2024-07-04

5. Regional Consequences;Shared Rule in Federal Theory and Practice;2024-07-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3