Hybrid Ethics

Author:

McStay Andrew

Abstract

Abstract This chapter expands upon the ethical orientation of Automating Empathy. It observes that for many people modern life is symbiotic with technologies that function by means of networks and data about intimate aspects of human life. It proposes ‘hybrid ethics’ as a means of considering the terms of connectivity with sociotechnical systems. With data ethics seen as less a matter of the right to be alone than interest in the terms of connectivity with systems and organisations, there is scope for controversy. The chapter accounts for this by discussing surveillance realism, overinterest in technology and usability, acceptance of dominance by major technology platforms, and seduction by marketing rhetoric. The hybrid view is argued to be mindful of these, instead purporting to rearrange and imagine alternative possibilities. The chapter progresses to simplify the chapter’s philosophically normative view for applied usage. This distils to questions of what sorts of technologies do people want to live with, on what terms, how do they affect the existing order of things, at what cost do the benefits of given technologies come, and how can the relationship be better?

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference447 articles.

1. Brain–computer interfaces and disability: Extending embodiment, reducing stigma?;Journal of Medical Ethics,2016

2. Achterhuis, Hans.  2001. “Andrew Feenberg: Farewell to Dystopia.” In American Philosophy of Technology: The Empirical Turn, edited by Hans Achterhuis, 65–93. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

3. Adler-Bell, Sam, and Michelle Miller. 2018. “The Datafication of Employment.” Last modified April 22, 2022. https://tcf.org/content/report/datafication-employment-surveillance-capitalism-shaping-workers-futures-without-knowledge/.

4. Adorno, Theodor W.  1976 [1969]. “Introduction.” In The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, edited by Theodor W. Adorno, Hans Albert, and Ralf Dahrendorf, 1–67. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3