Author:
Mayer Christopher,Moulton Stephanie
Abstract
Abstract
This chapter examines the usage of reverse mortgages among mortgage borrowers, as well as applicants rejected for new mortgage credit who are age 62+. We find that 17–27 percent of actual and rejected borrowers would have qualified for a Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) reverse mortgage, or nine to 14 times the size of the actual HECM market. The existence of a large number of seniors with an existing mortgage or taking out a new mortgage with quite high loan to value ratios (LTVs) (57–65%, depending on the product) suggests that many seniors do, in fact, utilize home equity in order to fund their retirement. Yet they choose products that require monthly payments lasting decades into retirement and rising as a share of (declining) income as they age. We consider a number of possible explanations for why seniors in the US do not spend home equity and instead rely on loans with high repayments, including precautionary savings for health shocks, bequest motives, high costs of reverse mortgages, and the lack of brand name institutions in the reverse mortgage business.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference52 articles.
1. The Joy of Giving or Assisted Living? Using Strategic Surveys to Separate Public Care Aversion from Bequest Motives,;Journal of Finance,,2011
2. Who Receives Medicaid in Old Age? Rules and Reality,;Fiscal Studies,2018
3. Brown, M., D. Lee, J. Scally, and W. van der Klaauw (2020). ‘The Graying of American Debt,’ in O. S. Mitchell and A. Lusardi, eds., Remaking Retirement: Debt in an Aging Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 35–59.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献