The inferentialist view of natural kinds

Author:

Massimi Michela

Abstract

Abstract This chapter begins to unpack the view of Natural Kinds with a Human Face (NKHF). Chapter 6 placed phenomena rather than properties centre-stage, while Chapter 7 gave the reasons for introducing a more liberal account of natural kinds that can shed light on engineered kinds, empty kinds, kinds in-the-making, and ultimately treat all bona fide natural kinds as evolving kinds. This chapter begins to lay out an inferentialist view of natural kinds that is akin to Neurath’s Boat in being anti-foundationalist and anti-essentialist. Section 8.2 clarifies the Neurathian spirit of the strategy and locates it in the wider context of the rise of inferentialism in philosophy of science, philosophy of physics and philosophy more generally. Section 8.3 discusses the naturalism inherent in this approach to natural kinds: historical naturalism. Section 8.4 illustrates it with an example from ethnobotany, which shed light on the ability of a plurality of situated epistemic communities to historically identify groupings of modally robust phenomena and to fine-grain or coarse-grain associated descriptions of natural kinds in a perspectivalist and thoroughgoingly anti-foundationalist way. Finally, Section 8.4 elucidates some of the details in this inferentialist story, namely how phenomena display (causal or non-causal) lawlike dependencies among relevant features, and how epistemic communities with their respective situated knowledges learn over time to rely on these lawlike dependencies in order to distinguish between in-the-making kinds that are in fact empty kinds and those that instead become evolving kinds.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference743 articles.

1. Planck 2015 results: XIII. Cosmological parameters;Astronomy & Astrophysics,2015

2. Planck intermediate results: XLVI. Reduction of large-scale systematic effects in HFI polarization maps and estimation of the reionization optical depth;Astronomy & Astrophysics,2016

3. Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure;Physical Review Letters,2017

4. Adequacy-for-purpose: the best deal a model can get;The Modern Schoolman,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3