Author:
Lyngby Pedersen Viki Møller
Abstract
Abstract
This chapter examines age discrimination from the perspective of age-differentiated paternalism. Many people share the intuition that paternalism is less problematic when applied to children than to the elderly. The chapter examines this intuition by considering not only the dimensions of competence and voluntariness but also the magnitude of the good promoted by paternalistic interventions. While this dual account does not generally challenge common-sense intuitions about paternalism, it introduces additional complexity when evaluating paternalistic interventions in a wide range of cases where age plays a part. The chapter considers many examples, from age-differentiated rules for access to sterilization, through age-differentiated fines for not using a helmet, to age-differentiated prices for cigarettes.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference28 articles.
1. What is the Point of Equality?;Ethics,1999
2. The Accuracy of Electoral Regulations: The Case of the Right to Vote by People with Cognitive Impairment;Social Policy and Society,2014
3. Birnbacher, Dieter. 2015. ‘Paternalism in Education and the Future’. In The Nature of Children’s Well-Being. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research 9, ed. Alexander Bagattini and Colin Macleod. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 107–122.
4. Fair Innings;Bioethics,2015
5. Deciding for Others;Milbank Quarterly,1986
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献