Introduction

Author:

Abrams Peter A.

Abstract

AbstractChapter 1 presents a brief history of mathematical theory in ecology dealing with interspecific competition. It argues that competition is a key process in the dynamics of all ecological systems. The chapter then presents the original 2-species model of competition developed independently by Lotka and Volterra. The lack of resources in this model is argued to be a major shortcoming. The definition of a single resource is treated briefly. The more recent history of competition theory is outlined, beginning with a brief discussion of Robert MacArthur’s consumer–resource model. Following a hiatus of research on competition in the last two decades of the twentieth century, theoretical work has increased. However, much of this work has focused on classifying mechanisms of coexistence, rather than developing models that could help predict or understand changes in abundances. While some recent authors have explored models with resources, many have continued to explore models in which competition is modelled as a direct effect. Those who have included resources have most often assumed linear relationships for all of the component functions, such as resource per capita growth rate and consumer functional response. The chapter discusses reasons for this very narrow range of models, and some of its adverse effects on our current understanding. The final section classifies the chapters, and discusses the mathematical background required to understand them.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference529 articles.

1. Limiting similarity and the form of the competition coefficient.;Theoretical Population Biology,1975

2. Niche overlap and environmental variability.;Mathematical Biosciences,1976

3. Density independent mortality and interspecific competition: a test of Pianka’s niche overlap hypothesis.;American Naturalist,1977

4. Consumer functional response and competition in consumer–resource systems.;Theoretical Population Biology,1980

5. Are competition coefficients constant? Inductive vs. deductive approaches.;American Naturalist,1980

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3