Taming Polycentric Governing

Author:

Galán Alexis

Abstract

Abstract This chapter examines Global Administrative Law (GAL). GAL’s key contribution to the study of polycentric governing is the claim that many of the processes that are taken place transnationally can be understood as a species of administrative law. Transnational institutions and actors work in similar ways to how domestic administrative agencies operate, even if the exercise of power of these transnational institution and actors differs from how administrative agencies operate within states. The chapter discusses how the reliance on administrative law has a dual purpose. On the one hand, administrative law allows to capture processes that otherwise would be missing from conventional accounts of international law. At the same time, administrative law provides a set of normative tools allowing the evaluation and reform of transnational institution in order to make them more accountable in light of the power that they have accumulated in the last decades. Lastly, the chapter considers some potentially problematic features of GAL such as its Western-centric bias, the possibility of GAL being used as cover for hegemonic projects, and its technocratic liberalism.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference46 articles.

1. Global Administrative Law: The View from Basel;European Journal of International Law,2006

2. State Consent and Disagreement in International Law-Making. Dissolving the Paradox;Leiden Journal of International Law,2016

3. Casini, Lorenzo. 2022. ‘Global Administrative Law’. In International Legal Theory: Foundations and Frontiers, edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, pp. 199–219. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4. Casini, Lorenzo, and Giulia Mannucci. 2012. ‘Hybrid Public-Private Bodies Within Global Private Regimes: The World Anti-Doping-Agency (WADA)’. In Global Administrative Law: The Casebook, edited by Sabino Cassese, Bruno Carotti, Lorenzo Casini, Eleonora Cavalieri, and Euan MacDonald, pp. 194–204. 3rd ed. New York, NY: The Institute for International Law and Justice/Rome: Istituto di Ricerche sulla Pubblica Amministrazione.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3