Abstract
Abstract
1 Introduction
Philosophical concerns rarely force their way into the average mathematician’s workday. But, in extreme circumstances, fundamental questions can arise as to the legitimacy of a certain manner of proceeding, say, as to whether a particular object should be granted ontological status, or whether a certain conclusion is epistemologically warranted. There are then two distinct views as to the role that philosophy should play in such a situation. On the first view, the mathematician is called upon to turn to the counsel of philosophers, in much the same way as a nation considering an action of dubious international legality is called upon to turn to the United Nations for guidance. After due consideration of appropriate regulations and guidelines (and, possibly, debate between representatives of different philosophical factions), the philosophers render a decision, by which the dutiful mathematician abides.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Fermat’s Last Theorem;Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Mathematical Practice;2024
2. Reading Mathematical Texts with Structuralist Semiotics;Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Mathematical Practice;2024
3. Dedication;A Plea for Natural Philosophy;2023-02-16
4. Copyright Page;A Plea for Natural Philosophy;2023-02-16
5. Reading Mathematical Texts with Structuralist Semiotics;Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Mathematical Practice;2023