Bottom-Up Review

Author:

Spieker Luke Dimitrios

Abstract

Abstract This chapter examines the role that national constitutional courts can play in stabilizing the constitutional homogeneity across the Verbund. Many national legal systems feature certain constitutional principles which make up the Member State’s constitutional identity and which must be respected at the EU level. Voicing concerns in this respect before the Court of Justice and assessing the Union’s compliance with these principles can become an important tool for securing the Verbund’s constitutional homogeneity. Currently, however, many identity doctrines seem rather geared towards destructive contestation. In order for them to become a constructive bottom-up check, this chapter suggests articulating identity concerns under the banner of Article 2 TEU. Eventually, the Union’s values and the Member States’ constitutional identities consist of overlapping principles. Such a shift would foster a more constructive dialogue, counter abuses of identity doctrines, and help ensure constitutional homogeneity throughout the Verbund.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference1258 articles.

1. The European Stability Mechanism through the Legal Meanderings of the Union’s Constitutionalism: Comment on Pringle;European Law Review,2013

2. L’exigence d’independance du juge, paradigme de l’Union européenne comme union de droit;Journal de droit européen,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3