Police Interview

Author:

Bevan Miranda

Abstract

Abstract This final empirical chapter addresses the culmination of the custody process—the police interview—and evaluates the outcomes of police detention against the theoretical framework. I review the challenges of assessing fitness for interview in the custody block and the inadequacies of the current arrangements. In relation to the obtaining of accurate and reliable evidence, the analysis explores the cumulative impact of the child’s custody experience on their ability to cope with interview and to give a good account of themselves when questioned. I focus, in particular, on the counterproductive impact of coercive interviewing tactics, which are liable to confuse and frustrate rather than to foster effective participation and elicit reliable evidence. I argue, in the conclusion, for a recognition that, in most cases, the investigation, and the wider purposes of the youth justice process, are not best served by interviewing a child in detention.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference481 articles.

1. Adams C, ‘Suspect Data: Arresting Research’ in RD King and E Wincup (eds), Doing Research on Crime and Justice (OUP 2000).

2. Prevalences and Configurations of Mental Disorders among Institutionalized Adolescents;Developmental Neurorehabilitation,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3