Author:
Bar-On Dorit,Chrisman Matthew
Abstract
Abstract
A standard way to explain the connection between ethical claims and motivation is to say that these claims express motivational attitudes. Unless this connection is taken to be merely a matter of contingent psychological regularity, it may seem that there are only two options for understanding it. Either we can treat ethical claims as expressing propositions that entail something about the speaker’s motivational attitudes (subjectivism), or we can treat ethical claims as nonpropositional and as having their semantic content constituted by the motivational attitudes they directly express (noncognitivism).
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Logical Possibility of Moral Dilemmas in Expressivist Semantics;European journal of analytic philosophy;2024-03-24
2. Disagreement in Aesthetics and Ethics: Against the Received Image;The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism;2024
3. Preface;Belief, Agency, and Knowledge;2022-06-30
4. Dedication;Belief, Agency, and Knowledge;2022-06-30
5. Copyright Page;Belief, Agency, and Knowledge;2022-06-30