Conclusion

Author:

Bremer Björn

Abstract

Abstract Chapter 9 summarizes the main argument and the empirical findings from the previous chapters. It outlines the broader contributions of the book, raises open questions that the book cannot answer, and suggests possible avenues for future research. Finally, the book concludes by re-evaluating the fate of social democracy in Europe in the twenty-first century in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Following the Great Recession, social democracy experienced a profound electoral crisis across Europe and the conclusion explores whether and how social democratic parties can escape from this crisis. It argues that the policy crisis caused by the pandemic and the war in Ukraine provides both opportunities and risks for the centre-left: it contributed to a favourable shift in economic discourse, but it also massively increased government debt. As the pressures on governments to return to austerity could increase again, social democratic parties need to escape from their electoral and ideational trap identified in the book. They need to rediscover the state as a strong actor that corrects market outcomes and protects the weakest members of society from unwanted excesses of capitalism. To this end, social democratic parties need to develop new bold ideas that respond to some of the biggest economic and political challenges of our time, redefining their raison d’âtre. Only this will allow them to regain their place at the heart of European politics.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference519 articles.

1. Moderate as necessary: the role of electoral competitiveness and party size in explaining parties’ policy shifts.;Journal of Politics,2016

2. The electoral appeal of party strategies in postindustrial societies: when can the mainstream left succeed?;Journal of Politics,2019

3. What moves parties? The role of public opinion and global economic conditions in Western Europe.;Comparative Political Studies,2009

4. Policy adjustment by parties in response to rival parties’ policy shifts: spatial theory and the dynamics of party competition in twenty-five post-war democracies.;British Journal of Political Science,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3