The Electoral Effects of Social Democratic Austerity

Author:

Bremer Björn

Abstract

Abstract Chapter 8 examines the electoral consequences of social democratic austerity. A lot of research suggests that mainstream parties benefit from programmatic moderation because it allows them to capture ‘potential’ centrist voters. Yet, austerity is often incompatible with the brand of social democratic parties, threatening to undermine the partisan attachment of their ‘core’ voters. This chapter tests which effect dominates by analysing the electoral effects of social democratic austerity during the Great Recession. It uses time-series-cross-section analysis to examine the relationship between austerity events and the popularity of centre-left parties in twelve European countries from 2008 to 2017. The results show that social democrats lost support when they implemented austerity and that this effect persisted over time. The chapter then uses individual-level panel analysis based on the British Election Study (BES) to examine how voters responded when the Labour Party adopted orthodox policies in election campaigns. Potential voters who are fiscally conservative were unlikely to support the party. Rather, orthodox fiscal policies undermined the party’s ability to mobilize its core voters that were opposed to austerity. This contributed to the crisis of social democracy in Europe.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference519 articles.

1. Moderate as necessary: the role of electoral competitiveness and party size in explaining parties’ policy shifts.;Journal of Politics,2016

2. The electoral appeal of party strategies in postindustrial societies: when can the mainstream left succeed?;Journal of Politics,2019

3. What moves parties? The role of public opinion and global economic conditions in Western Europe.;Comparative Political Studies,2009

4. Policy adjustment by parties in response to rival parties’ policy shifts: spatial theory and the dynamics of party competition in twenty-five post-war democracies.;British Journal of Political Science,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3