Abstract
Abstract
Negative polarity phenomena, as exemplified in the behavior of English any, and scalar implicatures, as exemplified by, say, the interpretations of some (i.e., “at least one and possibly all” vs. “at least one but not all”), have often been felt to be closely related. However, the exact nature of such a relationship remains as of now not fully understood, insofar as I can tell. And in fact, some important empirical generalizations pertaining to it, if not altogether missed, have perhaps not been properly appreciated. In this chapter, I address the issue of what are the relevant factual connections between scalar implicature and negative polarity and what we can learn from this about the grammatical mechanisms at the basis of these phenomena. One of the features that makes the analysis of negative polarity items (NPIs) and scalar implicatures (SIs) particularly interesting is that they raise a number of key questions concerning how syntax, semantics, and pragmatics interact with each other. We will mostly focus on the interface of pragmatics with syntax and semantics. More specifically, here is a widespread view of the latter.
Publisher
Oxford University PressNew York, NY
Cited by
71 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A distributed analysis of only;Linguistics and Philosophy;2024-08
2. Beyond dogwhistles;Signaling without Saying;2024-07-04
3. Dogwhistles and trust;Signaling without Saying;2024-07-04
4. Vigilance and hypervigilance;Signaling without Saying;2024-07-04
5. Enriching dogwhistles;Signaling without Saying;2024-07-04