Abstract
Abstract
This chapter analyses the crucial role of stylistic variety in the exploration of love by such a stylistically self-conscious poem as Troilus and Criseyde. The chapter’s opening section focusses on a play of style in the poem’s alertness to distinctions of style and register. Then comes a section on the poem’s use of: romance vocabulary; terms linked with pagan belief; learned and scientific terminology; Troilus diction that overlaps with Chaucer’s Boethian translation, Boece; nonce words prefixed with un- and other uses of prefixes and suffixes. Next is a section on Chaucer’s use of hyperbole and superlative—and of oaths, acclamations, and endearments—concluding with the poem’s references to the heart. There follows analysis of the poem’s imagery: heat and cold; light and darkness; sight and blindness; navigation; binding and constraint; hunting and bird imagery. Two concluding sections address proverbial language and stylistic aspects of versification in Troilus.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference736 articles.
1. Irony in Troilus’ Apostrophe to the Vacant House of Criseyde;Modern Language Quarterly,1963
2. Criseyde: Woman in Medieval Society;Chaucer Review,1979