Author:
Powell Emilia Justyna,Wiegand Krista E.
Abstract
Abstract
Chapter 5 presents the research design—a multimethod approach, which combines quantitative analysis of an original dataset of attempts at peaceful resolution in territorial disputes (1945–2015), primary documents, and a series of qualitative interviews, with a particular focus on the 2013–2016 Philippines v. China arbitration. The quantitative data, the Peaceful Resolution of Territorial Disputes (PRTD) dataset, provides observations of proposer state-level behavior in a cross-sectional time series format and gauges preferences of challenger and target states. It also devotes considerable attention to patterns of territorial dispute resolution since 1945, and discusses trends and frequencies of resolution attempts via specific peaceful resolution methods across the geographic regions of the world: Europe, the Americas, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia/Oceania. territorial dispute, peaceful settlement, Europe, Americas, Africa, Middle East, Asia, Oceania
Publisher
Oxford University PressNew York
Reference347 articles.
1. Why States Act through Formal International Organizations.;Journal of Conflict Resolution,1998
2. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance.;International Organization,2000
3. Abou El Fadl, Khaled. 2003. “Conflict Resolution as a Normative Value in Islamic Law: Handling Disputes with Non-Muslims.” In Faith-Based Diplomacy: Trumping Realpolitik, edited by Douglas Johnson, 178–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Conceptualizing Shari’a in the Modern State.;Villanova Law Review,2012