Author:
Mitchell Olivia S.,Hammond P. Brett,Maurer Raimond
Abstract
Abstract
Since its green shoots first emerged around 50 years ago, acceptance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations in institutional investing—especially in pension funds—has evolved with distinct shifts in investor preferences. This Pension Research Council volume traces these shifts and their implications, leading up to the present day. The book notes that investors have diverse reasons for devoting attention to ESG criteria when deciding where to invest their money. Some have had religious motives, such as Quakers who focus on values; this approach can offer some risk mitigation. Nevertheless, studies that look at whether divestment actually changes behaviors of companies show that this rarely occurs. Accordingly, this book offers a variety of distinct viewpoints from a variety of countries, on whether, how, and when ESG criteria should, and should not, drive pension fund investments. Authors also find that policymakers should consider fund consolidation in private sector retirement systems, along with whether service-provider incentives could be better be aligned with sustainability incentives. For instance, boosting transparency in these markets would help generate better-informed policies, while providing beneficiaries with information relevant to their savings choices.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference17 articles.
1. Abnett, L. (2022). ‘Lawmaker Group Asks EU to Withdraw Green Investment Label for Gas,’ Reuters. https://www.yahoo.com/now/lawmaker-group-asks-eu-withdraw-111059059.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmluZy5jb20v&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAACTXejW_fMibnnDpVwu5bNOvZ19Q7lpsIbSpclsG7RARNrEmTSHIQme2gBcGhbp4sWMH92fs2wsmFKcymboQ5qwGlYaNRlVmnJZ4sBgKETdMS_qY8c0528ov-v8RwPrZ61fSUdb-WqTGahWR59C_gYgn_NPHNYVDkhMARhLWVN3I
2. Bauer, R. and P.M.A. Smeets (2023). ‘Eliciting Pension Beneficiaries’ Sustainability Preferences: Why and How?’ In P.B. Hammond, R. Maurer, and O.S. Mitchell13, eds., Pension Funds and Sustainable Investment: Challenges and Opportunities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 173–198.
3. Berg, F., J. Kolbel, and R. Rigobon. (2019). ‘Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings,’ SSRN Working Paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3438533.
4. Fabian, N., M. Homanen, N. Pedersen, and M. Slebos (2023). ‘Private Retirement Systems and Sustainability: Insights from Australia, the UK, and the US.’ In P.B. Hammond, R. Maurer, and O.S. Mitchell, eds., Pension Funds and Sustainable Investment: Challenges and Opportunities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 199–219.