Conclusions

Author:

Nyman John A.

Abstract

Abstract This chapter summarizes the main components of the quid pro quo theory compared to the corresponding components of conventional theory. After considering some of the empirical challenges that would be faced in applying the new theory, the main contributions of the theory are summarized. The chapter then illustrates the importance of the quid pro quo theory by reimagining the last 75 years of health insurance policy if it were based on the quid pro quo theory instead. The chapter, and book, concludes by reiterating the the book’s thesis. In an appendix, the acceptance among economists of two aspects of the quid pro quo theory—prospect theory’s finding that consumers prefer the risk of loss to a certain loss, and the theoretical finding that much of moral hazard is due to income effects—is shown to be far from complete. Some reasons for the reluctance to accept these aspects are suggested.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference364 articles.

1. Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions.;Management Science,2000

2. Addobbati, Andrea.  2016. “Italy 1500–1800: Cooperation and Competition.” In Marine Insurance: Origins and Institutions, 1300–1850, edited by A. B. Leonard, 46–77. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

3. Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.;American Economic Review,1972

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3