Internal Constraints

Author:

Goodin Robert E.

Abstract

AbstractA second driver of many of the mechanisms perpetuating advantage and disadvantage is more internal: the scarcity of time and attention that people can devote to processing information and utilizing other such resources as are available to them. In an information-rich society such as is given to us by the internet, problems of time and attention scarcity become acute. The ways we find for coping with those problems on the internet, and the biases built into them, are emblematic of our strategies for coping with scarcities of time and attention more generally. Search engines and decision algorithms are undeniably useful for processing the flood of internet information. But they are notoriously biased in their operations, sometimes in ways that are obvious and easily remedied but often in ways that are either opaque or hard to remedy even if detected. Even if people switch from one coping strategy to another, the new one might (indeed, we have every reason to suppose that it will) also be biased in some way or another. Since we need to devote time and attention to switching, and those are scarce, the coping mechanisms we employ will tend to be ‘sticky’, perpetually instantiating the same biases time and again.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference1050 articles.

1. Aaronson, Daniel; Daniel Hartley; and Bhashkar Mazmuder. 2019. The effects of the 1930s HOLC ‘redlining’ maps. WP 2017-12, revised February 2019. Chicago: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Available at <https://www.chicagofed.org/publications/working-papers/2017/wp2017-12>.

2. Abolafia, Mitchel Y.  1984. Structured anarchy: formal organization in the commodity futures markets. Pp. 129–50 in The Social Dynamics of Financial Markets, ed. Peter Adler and Patricia Adler. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

3. Persistence of power, elites and institutions.;American Economic Review,2008

4. Cameron’s cronies: The Bullingdon Club’s class of ‘87.,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3