Approaching Psychopathology from a Psychophysiological Perspective

Author:

Hedges Dawson,Steffen Patrick R.

Abstract

Abstract Traditional diagnostic approaches in psychopathology such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) emphasize a categorical approach that is inadequate to fully conceptualize psychopathology and therefore has limited ability to fully capture diagnosis and inform treatment. Psychophysiological methods, which use a dimensional approach in measurement, provide a stronger foundation for diagnosis and treatment in mental health than do categorical diagnostic methods. Two alternatives to the DSM, the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) and the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP), provide excellent frameworks for conceptualizing psychopathology from a psychophysiological perspective. Moving diagnosis from the traditional categorically based approach, exemplified by the DSM beginning in 1952, to diagnostic schemes that incorporate a dimensional approach emphasizing a holistic view of health and illness has the potential to overcome the inherent limitations of traditional categorical approaches to diagnosis in mental health allowing for more specificity in diagnosis and treatment.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference37 articles.

1. Mixed emotional experience is associated with and precedes improvements in psychological well-being.;PLoS ONE,2012

2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

3. Heart rate variability as a transdiagnostic biomarker of psychopathology.;International Journal of Psychophysiology,2015

4. Classification and psychopathology research.;Journal of Abnormal Psychology,2013

5. The p factor: One general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders?.;Clinical Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3