The Epistemic Benefits of Social Justice

Author:

Herzog Lisa

Abstract

Abstract This chapter argues that questions of social justice have an epistemic dimension: societies marred by high levels of inequality are more likely to lack the trust that is needed for successful epistemic processes in the democratic realm. They are more likely to be polarized and to let epistemic institutions decline for lack of public support. The chapter also discusses the nexus with a social sphere that has, arguably, a particularly strong influence on social trust: the workplace. More egalitarian and more participative social practices, in which individuals encounter each other at eye level and can develop bonds of trust with each other, have a greater likelihood of enabling individuals to “live in truth,” which is such a crucial precondition for democracy.

Publisher

Oxford University PressNew York

Reference896 articles.

1. Aalberg, Toril.  2017. “Does Public Media Enhance Citizen Knowledge? Sifting through the Evidence.” In The Death of Public Knowledge: How Free Markets Destroy the General Intellect, ed. Aeron Davis. London: Goldsmiths Press, 19–32.

2. Media System and the Political Information Environment: A Cross-National Comparison.;International Journal of Press/Politics,2010

3. Covid-19: Politicisation, ‘Corruption,’ and Suppression of Science: When Good Science Is Suppressed by the Medical-Political Complex, People Die.;British Medical Journal,2020

4. The Future of Professions: Occupation and Expertise in the Age of Organization.;Research in the Sociology of Organizations,1991

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3