Abstract
Abstract
Chapter 12 provides a detailed overview of theory and practice on the withdrawal of recognition or ‘derecognition’. Thus far, scholarship has for the most part only marginally addressed this matter, and generally only to reject it as legally impossible. However, this chapter takes note of an increased tendency by States to engage in derecognition in recent years and challenges the mainstream view that the act will always be deprived of legal value. It therefore introduces the concept of ‘quasi-derecognition’ as a type of act admitting that recognition was initially unlawful, but furthermore argues that actual derecognition may sometimes be possible in situations of contested statehood. These findings are based on an analysis of almost twenty notes verbales claiming to withdraw recognition of Kosovo since 2016.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference297 articles.
1. Cours general de droit international public;RCADI,1987
2. Positive Law and International Law;American Journal of International Law,1957
3. Rights and Duties of States;RCADI,1969
4. Secession in International Law and Relations: What Are We Talking About?;Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review,2013
5. Akande D, ‘Classification of Armed Conflicts: Relevant Legal Aspects’ in Elizabeth Wilmshurst (ed), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts (OUP 2012)