Author:
Babor Thomas F.,Casswell Sally,Graham Kathryn,Huckle Taisia,Livingston Michael,Österberg Esa,Rehm Jürgen,Room Robin,Rossow Ingeborg,Sornpaisarn Bundit
Abstract
Abstract
This chapter uses a political economy framework to answer the following questions. Who are the major players in the alcohol policy area? How does each player contribute to the policymaking process? What is their individual and collective impact on public health? The major stakeholders involved in the formulation, implementation, and enforcement of alcohol policy include government legislative bodies, health professionals, non-governmental organizations, the scientific community, the mass media, and commercial interests linked to the alcoholic beverage industry. An appreciation of the various players in the alcohol policy arena can heighten our understanding of the following fundamental conclusion—alcohol policy is often the product of competing interests, values, and ideologies. This chapter shows how industry interests diverge considerably from those of public health professionals and non-governmental organizations, and that working in partnership with the alcohol industry is likely to lead to ineffective policy in terms of public health and welfare.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference87 articles.
1. The beverage alcohol industry’s social aspects organizations: a public health warning.;Addiction,,2004
2. Public health, academic medicine, and the alcohol industry’s corporate social responsibility activities.;Am J Public Health,,2013
3. Babor TF, Morisano D, Noel J, et al. (2017) Infrastructure and career opportunities in addiction science: the emergence of an interdisciplinary field. In: Babor TF, Stenius K, Pates R, et al. (eds.) Publishing Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Ubiquity Press, pp. 9–34.
4. Is the alcohol industry doing well by ‘doing good’? Findings from a content analysis of the alcohol industry’s actions to reduce harmful drinking.;BMJ Open,,2018
5. By voluntary agreement: the politics of instrument selection.;Public Administration,,1986