Resolve and Reputation

Abstract

AbstractChapter 6 explores the notions of resolve and reputation. To establish its credibility to use nuclear force, a nuclear “superior” can arguably bolster its apparent “resolve” to convince the opponent that the cost of its transgressions will exceed any gains. Or else it can build—and then store—credibility for future use by establishing a “reputation” for standing by commitments or taking decisive action. A party can supposedly harness both mechanisms by establishing a “reputation for resolve.” The concepts of resolve and reputation are problematic, however, when employed to understand deterrence (or compellence) relationships. Outcomes that we often attribute to resolve, or reputations, owe to other plausible influences. Indeed, efforts to establish resolve or build a reputation for action might again prove ineffective or counterproductive.