Author:
Bruzelius Cecilia,Seeleib-Kaiser Martin
Abstract
Abstract
This chapter focuses on labor rights of mobile seasonal workers, and the enforcement thereof, in the agricultural and forestry sector of the EU. We demonstrate that although the EU has explicitly acknowledged the precarious working conditions of seasonal agricultural workers and the need to change policies in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic at the discursive level, the EU continues to have very limited enforcement capacities and competencies and plays an ambivalent role. As enforcement continues to depend on Member States’ policies and measures, we compare enforcement practices in the agriculture and forestry sector across four countries with different enforcement regimes—Austria, Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Our analysis suggests that seasonal workers’ rights in agriculture and forestry are neglected across countries, irrespective of enforcement regime. We argue that the scant efforts made to enforce these workers’ rights amounts to institutionalized exploitation of seasonal workers.
Publisher
Oxford University PressNew York
Reference67 articles.
1. Europeanisation, new political cleavages and policy concertation in Switzerland.;European Journal of Industrial Relations,2010
2. Arnholtz, Jens, and Nathan Lillie, N. (eds.). 2020b. “European Integration and the Reconfiguration of National Industrial Relations: Posted Work as a Driver of Institutional Change.” In Arnholtz, Jens, and Nathan Lillie, Posted Work in the European Union: The Political Economy of Free Movement. Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 1–30.
3. Migrant seasonal workers in the European agricultural sector.” Briefing, PE 689.347,;European Parliamentary Research Service,2021
4. Minimum wages in 2021: Most countries settle for cautious increase.;EUROFOUND,2021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献