Author:
Miller Seumas,Bossomaier Terry
Abstract
Abstract
Cyberconflict can take place between nation-states, take various forms (e.g., cognitive warfare), and involve the use of cyberweapons (e.g., autonomous weapons). Cyberconflict is characteristically a species of covert political action and can be conducted with conventional warfare (e.g., Russia’s invasion of Ukraine). Cyberconflict should be conducted in accordance with moral principles, such as discrimination (i.e., avoiding the deliberate harming of innocents), necessity, and proportionality. However, the application of these principles in cyberspace differs from conventional warfare. A principle of reciprocity in the service of the collective good of global cybersecurity has application to cyberconflict. Regarding fully autonomous weapons (i.e., so-called human-out-of-the-loop weapons), they should be prohibited in most, if not all, circumstances.
Publisher
Oxford University PressNew York
Reference222 articles.
1. Russia Is Using an Onslaught of Cyber Attacks to Undermine Ukraine’s Defence Capabilities.;The Conversation,2022
2. ISIS vs US Government: A War of On-line Video Propaganda.;First Monday,2015
3. Anderson, David. Independent Reviewer of UK Terrorism Legislation, UK Government. “Report of the Bulk Powers Review.” 2016. https://terrorismlegislationreviewer.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Bulk-Powers-Review-final-report.pdf.
4. The Case for Ethical Autonomy in Unmanned Systems.;Journal of Military Ethics,2010