Conclusion

Author:

Lackey Jennifer

Abstract

Abstract This conclusion shows that an attack on epistemic agency is therewith an attack on autonomy, dignity, and ultimately on personhood. Suspects, defendants, witnesses, and victims who find their words, actions, and even feelings subjugated to the will of the State are not only wronged as epistemic agents, they are significantly violated as persons. While various reforms to the criminal legal system are recommended throughout this book, at its core, there is a prior, deeper, and far more fundamental transformation that is needed: the recognition and respect of the personhood of all of those who enter its doors. It is only through the hope and promise of respecting the personhood of each participant in the criminal legal system that we can truly grasp what justice demands and, in so doing, to reimagine what is possible.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Reference341 articles.

1. Turning Up the Lights on Gaslighting.;Philosophical Perspectives,2014

2. Hard Bargaining in Plea Bargaining: When do Prosecutors Cross the Line?;Nevada Law Journal,2017

3. Evidence, Probability, and the Burden of Proof.;Arizona Law Review,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3