Abstract
Abstract
This chapter examines the differentiated process of adjustment of institutionalist international relations (IR) to the Trump personalist-populist intrusion into the contest over institutional design. The nature of this response (or, in some cases, non-response) on the part of rationalist institutionalism has important implications for the reputation of literature. While unlike some components of realist or realist-influenced literature, no attempt can be detected to rationalize the Trump insurgency, the lack of any original anticipation on the part of the entire body of institutionalist IR exposes another major gap central to the argument in this book. This neglect is especially glaring given the high degree of US-centrism embedded in this literature.
Publisher
Oxford University PressOxford
Reference689 articles.
1. Why States Act through Formal International Organizations;The Journal of Conflict Resolution,1998
2. Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance;International Organization,2016
3. Abbott, Kenneth W., Philipp Genschel, Duncan Snidal, and Bernhard Zangl. 2010. ‘Competence–Control Theory: The Challenge of Governing through Intermediaries’. In The Governor’s Dilemma: Indirect Governance beyond Principals and Agents, edited by Kenneth W. Abbott, Bernhard Zangl, Duncan Snidal, and Philipp Genschel: pp. 3–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.